Hall of Fame calculate only calories burned; is better a index of ranking.
If i have run 150 km in 13 hours and burned only 12.500 calories because my IMC is 22 (800 kcal for 10 km) THIS IS GOOD!!!
If I calculate my ranking for this performance it is a good ranking; The actual statistic calculate only calories burned, but if I burned few calories running many km in short time … this is an index of a good athlete.
Wouldn’t it be better to think a "Mounthly Activity Level” in the same way of general one (sparrow, lion, buffalo, etc…) ?
Administrator said it was a good idea; this post is for share this idea with the comunity.